Zapier vs Make (Integromat)
Zapier and Make (Integromat) are popular automation tools. Here's how they compare on pricing, strengths, and who each is best for.
| Zapier | Make (Integromat) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Quick, simple automations across many apps | Complex, multi-step automations |
| Pricing | Free tier (~100 tasks/mo); paid plans scale | Free tier; paid plans priced by operations |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
Zapier
Free tierConnect apps with the largest integration catalog.
Zapier is the most popular no-code automation platform, linking thousands of apps with simple trigger-action 'Zaps'. It's the easiest way to automate repetitive handoffs without writing code.
Pros
- Largest integration library
- Easiest to learn
- Templates for common workflows
Cons
- Costs rise with task volume
- Limited for complex branching
Make (Integromat)
Free tierVisual automation with granular control.
Make (formerly Integromat) provides a visual canvas for building multi-step automations with branching, filters, and data transforms — ideal for complex scenarios that outgrow simple trigger-action tools.
Pros
- Powerful visual builder
- Granular logic and data transforms
- Good value per operation
Cons
- Steeper learning curve
- Complex scenarios get harder to maintain
The bottom line
Choose Zapier if you want quick, simple automations across many apps. Choose Make (Integromat) if you want complex, multi-step automations.
Outbound links go to vendor websites — we do not currently earn commissions. Disclosure. Always confirm current pricing and features on each vendor's site before you buy.